Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 389(19): 1766-1777, 2023 Nov 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815935

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nursing home residents are at high risk for infection, hospitalization, and colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms. METHODS: We performed a cluster-randomized trial of universal decolonization as compared with routine-care bathing in nursing homes. The trial included an 18-month baseline period and an 18-month intervention period. Decolonization entailed the use of chlorhexidine for all routine bathing and showering and administration of nasal povidone-iodine twice daily for the first 5 days after admission and then twice daily for 5 days every other week. The primary outcome was transfer to a hospital due to infection. The secondary outcome was transfer to a hospital for any reason. An intention-to-treat (as-assigned) difference-in-differences analysis was performed for each outcome with the use of generalized linear mixed models to compare the intervention period with the baseline period across trial groups. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 28 nursing homes with a total of 28,956 residents. Among the transfers to a hospital in the routine-care group, 62.2% (the mean across facilities) were due to infection during the baseline period and 62.6% were due to infection during the intervention period (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.04). The corresponding values in the decolonization group were 62.9% and 52.2% (risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88), for a difference in risk ratio, as compared with routine care, of 16.6% (95% CI, 11.0 to 21.8; P<0.001). Among the discharges from the nursing home in the routine-care group, transfer to a hospital for any reason accounted for 36.6% during the baseline period and for 39.2% during the intervention period (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.12). The corresponding values in the decolonization group were 35.5% and 32.4% (risk ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88 to 0.96), for a difference in risk ratio, as compared with routine care, of 14.6% (95% CI, 9.7 to 19.2). The number needed to treat was 9.7 to prevent one infection-related hospitalization and 8.9 to prevent one hospitalization for any reason. CONCLUSIONS: In nursing homes, universal decolonization with chlorhexidine and nasal iodophor led to a significantly lower risk of transfer to a hospital due to infection than routine care. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Protect ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03118232.).


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Infecciones Asintomáticas , Clorhexidina , Infección Hospitalaria , Casas de Salud , Povidona Yodada , Humanos , Administración Cutánea , Administración Intranasal , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Baños , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/terapia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Povidona Yodada/administración & dosificación , Povidona Yodada/uso terapéutico , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Infecciones Asintomáticas/terapia
2.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 21(12): 1937-1943.e2, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32553489

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing organisms (ESBLs), and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) among residents and in the environment of nursing homes (NHs). DESIGN: Point prevalence sampling of residents and environmental sampling of high-touch objects in resident rooms and common areas. SETTING: Twenty-eight NHs in Southern California from 2016 to 2017. PARTICIPANTS: NH participants in Project PROTECT, a cluster-randomized trial of enhanced bathing and decolonization vs routine care. METHODS: Fifty residents were randomly sampled per NH. Twenty objects were sampled, including 5 common room objects plus 5 objects in each of 3 rooms (ambulatory, total care, and dementia care residents). RESULTS: A total of 2797 swabs were obtained from 1400 residents in 28 NHs. Median prevalence of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) carriage per NH was 50% (range: 24%-70%). Median prevalence of specific MDROs were as follows: MRSA, 36% (range: 20%-54%); ESBL, 16% (range: 2%-34%); VRE, 5% (range: 0%-30%); and CRE, 0% (range: 0%-8%). A median of 45% of residents (range: 24%-67%) harbored an MDRO without a known MDRO history. Environmental MDRO contamination was found in 74% of resident rooms and 93% of common areas. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In more than half of the NHs, more than 50% of residents were colonized with MDROs of clinical and public health significance, most commonly MRSA and ESBL. Additionally, the vast majority of resident rooms and common areas were MDRO contaminated. The unknown submerged portion of the iceberg of MDRO carriers in NHs may warrant changes to infection prevention and control practices, particularly high-fidelity adoption of universal strategies such as hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, and decolonization.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Casas de Salud , Prevalencia
3.
Director ; 12(1): 42, 44-9, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19178117

RESUMEN

COPD is a disease that affects a significant number of residents in nursing facilities. This disease is partially reversible, especially with early diagnosis and proper intervention. The severity of disease varies from resident to resident. The nursing staff has a significant role in identifying, assessing, and managing residents with COPD. Training and education are essential to success. Appropriate use of nonpharmacological and pharmacological modalities can slow the progression of disease and improve a resident's ADLs and QOL.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Actividades Cotidianas , Administración por Inhalación , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Enfermería Geriátrica , Humanos , Rol de la Enfermera , Casas de Salud , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Selección de Paciente , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/psicología , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Teofilina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...